There are a few things to consider when selecting an electronic reviewer. Each reviewer is given a structured electronic template. This template provides a step-by–step guide to organizing the review. The template will also include information about conflicts of interest for the electronic reviewer. A well-structured and structured electronic review is key to quality applications.
Electronic structure template
The Structured electronic reviewer template was developed to help the reviewer structure their reviews. It allows reviewers to focus on the key findings and points and also identifies revisions that are required for publication or optional changes. It also indicates any referee issues that may be relevant for the article. Reviewers use the template to provide critical feedback on the submitted manuscripts.
The Structured electronic reviewer template was introduced to the journal in August 2010. Since the introduction of this new process, more than 80 reviews have been performed. This study will examine the impact of the structured, electronic reviewer template in manuscript reviews.
Conflicts of interests for electronic reviewers
The journal should inform electronic reviewers of any conflicts of interest. Conflict of interest occurs when an author has an interest that could affect the ability to give a fair, objective evaluation of the work. Relevant commercial relations include research funding, grants and materials as well as in-kind service.
Conflicts of Interest can arise when a reviewer has personal or business relationships. These conflicts can arise from personal relationships, academic competition, or intellectual passion.